![]() Furthermore, considerations such as garment pressure have been estimated to be reported in only one third of the literature to date. upper body vs lower body ), the level of competition at which the athlete/participant competes, the type of exercise performed, and the athlete’s belief in the product. during exercise and/or recovery), the garment pressure and distribution, where compression is applied (e.g. For example, research varies according to when the garments are worn (e.g. The inconsistencies in compression garment and exercise outcomes observed throughout the scientific literature are likely due to a number of methodological reasons. Therefore, a scoping review that considers the entire area would provide practitioners and researchers with an overview of the current scientific literature and help support future research. With the growing interest in compression garments, there is still ambiguity concerning their potential benefits, the research methodologies applied, and how practitioners should prescribe their use. However, a wide range of mechanisms for their potential efficacy have been provided. There has been considerable attention given to these garments for their potential ergogenic effects on performance and recovery, with athletes commonly wearing them during competition or in the hours and days following exercise. Simply, compression garments provide mechanical pressure to the body, which may have physiological, biomechanical, performance, and perceptual benefits for individuals exercising. The use of compression garments during and following exercise has become increasingly popular over the last three decades. Future research should assess wearer belief in compression garments, report pressure ranges at multiple sites as well as garment material, and finally examine individual responses and varying compression coverage areas. It is unlikely that compression garments negatively influence exercise-related outcomes. Compression garments increase localised skin temperature and may reduce perceptions of muscle soreness and pain following exercise however, rating of perceived exertion during exercise is likely unchanged. Findings suggest potential increases in arterial blood flow however, it is unlikely that compression garments meaningfully change metabolic responses, blood pressure, heart rate, and cardiorespiratory measures. Compression likely reduces muscle oscillatory properties and has a positive effect on sensorimotor systems. ConclusionsĮvidence is equivocal as to whether garments improve physical performance, with little evidence supporting improvements in kinetic or kinematic outcomes. Approximately 85% ( n = 156) of studies were published between 20. In total, 183 studies were identified for qualitative analysis with the following breakdown: performance and muscle function outcomes: 115 studies (63%), biomechanical and neuromuscular: 59 (32%), blood and saliva markers: 85 (46%), cardiovascular: 76 (42%), cardiorespiratory: 39 (21%), thermoregulatory: 19 (10%) and perceptual: 98 (54%). MethodsĪ systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science and CINAHL Complete) was performed from the earliest record to 27 December, 2020. ![]() The aim of this scoping review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the effects of compression garments on commonly assessed outcome measures in response to exercise, including: performance, biomechanical, neuromuscular, cardiovascular, cardiorespiratory, muscle damage, thermoregulatory, and perceptual responses. However, evidence for their efficacy is varied and the methodological approaches and outcome measures used within the scientific literature are diverse. Compression garments are regularly worn during exercise to improve physical performance, mitigate fatigue responses, and enhance recovery.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |